In order to continue enjoying our site, we ask that you confirm your identity as a human. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Approaches (on this site) refer to an integrated package of options (methods or processes). For example, 'Randomized Controlled Trials' (RCTs) use a combination of the options random sampling, control group and standardised indicators and measures. A strengths-based approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation by identifying and investigating outlier examples of good practice and ways of increasing their frequency. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it An approach that focuses on assessing the value of an intervention as perceived by the (intended) beneficiaries, thereby aiming to give voice to their priorities and concerns. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it A research design that focuses on understanding a unit (person, site or project) in its context, which can use a combination of qualitative and quantitative data. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it An approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation, which identifies the processes required to achieve desired results, and then observes whether those processes take place, and how. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it An impact evaluation approach based on contribution analysis, with the addition of processes for expert review and community review of evidence and conclusions. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it An impact evaluation approach that iteratively maps available evidence against a theory of change, then identifies and addresses challenges to causal inference. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it An approach used to surface, elaborate, and critically consider the options and implications of boundary judgments, that is, the ways in which people/groups decide what is relevant to what is being evaluated. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it Various ways of doing evaluation in ways that support democratic decision making, accountability and/or capacity. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it An approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation, through iterative, embedded evaluation. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it A stakeholder involvement approach designed to provide groups with the tools and knowledge they need to monitor and evaluate their own performance and accomplish their goals. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it A particular type of case study used to jointly develop an agreed narrative of how an innovation was developed, including key contributors and processes, to inform future innovation efforts. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it A way to jointly develop an agreed narrative of how an innovation was developed, including key contributors and processes, to inform future innovation efforts. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it A particular type of case study used to create a narrative of how institutional arrangements have evolved over time and have created and contributed to more effective ways to achieve project or program goals. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it Approach primarily intended to clarify differences in values among stakeholders by collecting and collectively analysing personal accounts of change. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it An impact evaluation approach suitable for retrospectively identifying emergent impacts by collecting evidence of what has changed and, then, working backwards, determining whether and how an intervention has contributed to these changes. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it An impact evaluation approach which unpacks an initiative’s theory of change, provides a framework to collect data on immediate, basic changes that lead to longer, more transformative change, and allows for the plausible assessment of the initiative’s contribution to results via ‘boundary partners’. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it A range of approaches that engage stakeholders (especially intended beneficiaries) in conducting the evaluation and/or making decisions about the evaluation. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it A participatory approach which enables farmers to analyse their own situation and develop a common perspective on natural resource management and agriculture at village level. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it A strengths-based approach to learning and improvement that involves intended evaluation users in identifying ‘outliers’ – those with exceptionally good outcomes - and understanding how they have achieved these. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it An impact evaluation approach without a control group that uses narrative causal statements elicited directly from intended project beneficiaries. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it An impact evaluation approach that compares results between a randomly assigned control group and experimental group or groups to produce an estimate of the mean net impact of an intervention. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it A Rapid Evaluation is an approach that uses multiple evaluation methods and techniques to quickly and systematically collect data when time or resources are limited. Many terms are used to describe these approaches, including real time evaluations, rapid feedback evaluation, rapid evaluation methods, rapid-cycle evaluation and rapid appraisal. The common feature of these different models is the expedited implementation timeframes which generally range from 10 days to 6 months. An approach especially to impact evaluation which examines what works for whom in what circumstances through what causal mechanisms, including changes in the reasoning and resources of participants. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it An participatory approach to value-for-money evaluation that identifies a broad range of social outcomes, not only the direct outcomes for the intended beneficiaries of an intervention. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it Click an approach on the left to navigate to it An approach to decision-making in evaluation that involves identifying the primary intended users and uses of an evaluation and then making all decisions in terms of the evaluation design and plan with reference to these. Click an approach on the left to navigate to it This Paper A short summary of this paper 37 Full PDFs related to this paper |
Propriety standards ensure that an evaluation is ethical
Postagens relacionadas
direito autoral © 2024 EstudaremCasa Inc.
